The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit recently ruled in Duch v. Jakubek, 2009 WL 4421267 (2d Cir. 2009), that a jury reasonably could find that a supervisor who ignored facts regarding suspected workplace sexual harassment had constructive knowledge of the harassment and, thereby, exposed his employer to liability under Title VII of the Civil Righ […]
"Love contract," is the common phrase that refers to a written confirmation that two employees' romantic relationship is voluntary, and that they both understand and know how to use employer policies that deal with harassment in the workplace. […]
The recent spotlight on David Letterman’s alleged affairs with female subordinates is a useful reminder for careful employers: create a systematic plan for dealing with workplace harassment and romantic relationships. And then follow it. […]
A federal appeals court in St. Louis has determined that evidence of other sexual harassment instances and complaints brought to an employer’s attention can be considered to show the severity and pervasiveness of a hostile work environment and of the employer having constructive notice of this workplace problem. Sandoval v. American Bldg. Maintenance Indus., […]
Your human resources director has brought you a tough one: one of your sales employees has complained that her Sales Manager harassed her sexually, and had made disparaging racial remarks about a customer. You're stunned because the manager has been a good performer, generating good numbers and seems like a real straight arrow guy. What do you do? […]
Reversing summary judgment in favor of the employer on an employee’ s racial and sexual harassment claims, the federal appeals court in Richmond has ruled that the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission presented sufficient evidence of harassment, and of the employer’ s failure to remedy the alleged harassment, that the case should go to a jury. EEOC v. Cen […]
The basis of an employer’s liability for a claim of hostile work environment under Title VII depends upon whether the harasser is the complainant’s supervisor or merely a co-worker. When a hostile work environment is created by a co-worker, the employer is liable only if the employer failed to provide an avenue for reporting the harassment, or if the employe […]
Most employers are well aware of their obligation to promptly and thoroughly investigate complaints of sexual harassment. Although the right to an adequate investigation is most commonly associated with the alleged victim, a recent decision by the Second Circuit Court of Appeals (covering New York, Connecticut, and Vermont) illustrates that an employer' […]
On June 8, 2009, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit handed down a decision that may narrow employers' liability in hostile work environment claims involving co-worker harassment. In Huston v. Procter & Gamble Paper Products Corp., the Third Circuit held that an employee with mere supervisory authority does not qualify as a "managem […]